Home » Campaigning, Headline

What to Expect From Your Text Messaging Efforts: 2010 Benchmarks

1 March 2010 View Comments

The ubiquitous calls to help Haiti by texting “Haiti” to 90999 last month, and the $41 million raised by the effort, may have opened your organization’s eyes to the possibilities of mobile messaging, but what are reasonable expectations for more run-of-the-mill mobile campaigns? To answer this question, M+R and MobileActive.org have released 2010 Nonprofit Text Messaging Benchmarks.

Building Your List

Percentages of subscribers who make a call (to a congressman, for example) or sign a petition via their mobile phones when asked to do so via text message

Percentages of subscribers who make a call (to a congressman, for example) or sign a petition via their mobile phones when asked to do so via text message

The report found that nonprofit text messaging lists grew at an annual rate of 49.5%, with the overwhelming majority of subscribers (80%) joining the lists by entering their mobile numbers on a Web page.

Most organizations leveraged their existing e-mail lists to grow their text messaging lists, which explains why most text subscribers are also e-mail subscribers (73% – 87%). “Hence,” says the report, “for the organizations in this study, text message is primarily being used to communicate with email supporters through an additional channel, not as a way to communicate with a different set of supporters.” This may be an important consideration when deciding whether to invest in building your text messaging lists — especially since the churn rate for text lists was much higher than that for e-mail lists: 30.7% vs. 19%, according to the report.

Messaging Your List

Fundraising may come first to mind for a text campaign these days, but the report found nonprofits and advocacy organizations are conducting five distinct types of messaging:

  • Fundraising – The $10 per donation limit is far less than the e-mail average, notes the report, but text fundraising messages increase the success rate of e-mail solicitations when subscribers receive both.
  • Advocacy – 4.7% of subscribers make a call (to their congressman, for example) when asked to do so via text message; 14.6% of subscribers sign a petition in reply to text messages asking them to do so.
  • Informational – News alerts or reminders to vote, for example.
  • Go-to-Web – Sending subscribers to a Web page to take a survey, take an action, or just check it out.
  • Text Reply – Asking subscribers for their thoughts/ideas, for example.

The free report has more specifics, of course, as well as links to case studies of many of the campaign types. I definitely recommend downloading it.

More Benchmarking Studies

See our previous posts on benchmarks for e-mail advocacy and fundraising and social networking.

  • My two questions:
    1. Does the use of Twitter on mobile phones have any connection to the high amounts raised via SMS?

    2. Since so many mobile supporters are also email supporters, could email donations go up by offering a 1-click solution. In other words, are the SMS donations, because users prefer donating over mobile, or because they can send a text and have the money automatically deducted from their phone bill -- no need to create accounts or enter credit card info?
blog comments powered by Disqus